Some current tasks and directions of scientific and technological development of JSC «NIIAS».

The review summaries the key issues considered at the meetings of the profile sections of the Scientific and Technical Council of NIIAS JSC in the first half of 2024. The existing problems are analyses and the tasks of future research in the key directions of scientific and technological development of the Institute are proposed. The issues related to the understanding of the Institute's management of the need for training of qualified personnel for maintenance and implementation of the latest intelligent systems of automation and diagnostics of infrastructure and rolling stock within the framework of development of the concept of digital railway station are highlighted. The results of the discussion of the concept, current state and prospects of unmanned aerial systems application in railway transport are presented. The issues considered during the scientificpractical seminar of IAMSH RAS-NIIAS are highlighted, as well as issues and tasks in the field of development of mechanisms for forecasting the condition of track infrastructure and approaches to the development of degradation model.

1. Zaynetdinov R.I., Rudnikova M.A., Plokhikh I. (2016) Russian experience of the availability function prediction for the ‘‘Velaro Rus’’high-speed train by means of the operation process simulation. In: Proceedings of the 7th DQM international conference life cycle engineering and management ICDQM-2016, pp 32–42.

2. Ерохин Г.В., Коновский В.В. (2014) Мониторинг показателей надежности зерноуборочного комбайна ACROS 530. ISSN 2305-2538 Наука в центральной России, №7, С. 16-21.

3. Зайнетдинов Р.И., Плохих И.В. (2012) Уточненная оценка и прогнозирование функции готовности поезда “Сапсан” на основе имитационного моделирования процесса эксплуатации //Транспорт: наука, техника, управление. № 12. С. 11–19.

4. Efron B. (1979) Bootstrap method: another look at jackknife. Ann Stat 7(1):1–26.

5. Адлер Ю. П. (1987) Бутстреп-моделирование при построении доверительных интервалов по цензурированным выборкам / Ю. П. Адлер, И. В. Гадолина, М. Н. Ляндрес // Заводская лаборатория. Т. 53, № 10. – С. 90-94. – EDN XIDVGN.

6. Marks C.E. (2014) Applying bootstrap methods to system reliability. Ann Stat 68(3):174–182.

7. Mannen E. (1991) When does Boostrtap work? Asymptotic results and simulation. Springer, Berlin.

8. Efron B., Tibshirani R.L. (1993) An introduction of the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall. CRC, New York.

9. Baxter L.A. (1996) Nonparametric estimation of limiting availability. Lifetime Data Anal. 2:391–402.

10. Беврани Х. (2005) Методы статистического анализа надежности сложных систем, основанные на некоторых асимптотических статистиках. Автореф. на соиск. степени к.т.н. М.: МГУ, 27 с.

11. Sunder R. Fatigue crack growth as a consequence of environment-enhanced brittlemicro fracture // Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. 2005. V. 28 (3). P. 289.

12. Sunder R. Unraveling the Science of Variable-Amplitude Fatigue // Journal of ASTM International. 2012. V. 9. № 1. Р. 20.

13. Sunder R., Porter W.J., Ashbaugh N.E. The Role of Air in Fatigue Load Interaction // Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2003. V. 26. Р. 1.

14. Gassner E. Strength experiments under cyclic loading in aircraft structures // Luftwissen. 1939. V. 6 (61–4) [in German].

15. Schuetz W. A History of Fatigue. Berlin: DVM, 2008. 40 p.

16. Schijve J. Observations on the prediction of fatigue crack growth propagation under variable amplitude loading // In: ASTM Special Technical Publications. Physics, 1976. P. 3, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP33360S

17. Расчёты и испытания на прочность. Методы механических испытаний металлов. Определение характеристик трещиностойкости (вязкости разрушения) при циклическом нагружении. Методические указания. РД 50-345-82. М.: Изд-во стандартов, 1983.

18. Sunder R. Fractographic Reassessment of the Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure / Eds. J. Newman, K.-H. Schwalbe // J. ASTM International. 2005. V. 2 (6). 18 p., https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI12003

19. Sunder R. On the hysteretic nature of variable-amplitude fatigue crack growth // Int J. Fatigue. 2005. V. 27. P. 1494.

20. Sunder R., Andronik A., Biakov A., Eremin E., Panin S., Savkin A. Combined action of crack closure and residual stress under periodic overloads: A fractographic Analysis // Int. J. Fatigue. 2016. V. 82. P. 667.

21. Sunder R. Fatigue crack growth as a consequence of environment-enhanced brittlemicro fracture // Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. 2005. V. 28 (3), P. 289.

22. Sunder R., Porter W.J., Ashbaugh N.E. The Role of Air in Fatigue Load Interaction // Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2003. V. 26. P. 1.

23. Sunder, R., Contribution of Individual Spectrum Cycles to Damage in Notch Crack Initiation, ASTM STP 1211, Short and Long Cracks, Eds (MR Mitchell and RW Landgraf), 1993, pp 19-29.

24. Лебединский С.Г., Москвитин Г.В. Оценка эксплуатационного порогового уровня нагружения для литых железнодорожных сталей // Проблемы машиностроения и автоматизации. 2021. № 1. С. 28. https://doi.org/10.52261/02346206_2021_1_28

25. Лебединский С.Г., Змеева В.Н. Закономерности развития усталостных трещин в литых сталях железнодорожных конструкций // Проблемы машиностроения и надёжности машин. 2000. № 3. С. 98.