Interpretable Control of Track Initiation with Predefined Intervention Bounds in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Perception Systems
https://doi.org/10.24412/3033-6007-2026-339-69-84
Abstract
In aerial monitoring systems, a single detection error may develop into a persistent false track and affect data passed to downstream components. The study aims to reduce such errors while bounding the scale of intervention in advance and retaining a traceable account of each decision. An external method is proposed that briefly delays low-support track-initiation episodes. The number of delays is controlled by an accumulated budget, while the support estimate, current budget balance, reason for intervention, and final status are recorded for each episode. The method was evaluated on seven video sequences from a publicly available aerial-imagery dataset containing small objects, partial occlusions, and substantial scale changes. Three tracking algorithms and a supervised ensemble of decision trees were compared. For ByteTrack, the delay was applied to 2.62 percent of track-initiation episodes, removing 425 false observations and 176 false initiations from the operational output, while the change in the combined precision-recall measure remained within the predefined tolerance. For OC-SORT and SORT, the reduction in false observations was not confirmed under the adopted statistical criterion. An examination of 29,385 initial video fragments found no violations of the predefined limits. The additional processing time averaged 0.901 milliseconds per frame. The results show that a short delay can reduce the number of false observations while keeping the scale of intervention under control.
About the Authors
Yu. V. TrofimovRussian Federation
Assistant Lecturer, Department of Systems Analysis and Management, Junior Researcher
A. N. Averkin
Russian Federation
Leading Researcher; Associate Professor, Leading Researcher
A. V. Shevchenko
Russian Federation
Senior Lecturer, Researcher
E. M. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
Programmer at the Artificial Intelligence Research Center
A. D. Lebedev
Russian Federation
Technician at the Artificial Intelligence Research Center
References
1. Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552
2. Bewley, A., Ge, Z., Ott, L., Ramos, F., & Upcroft, B. (2016). Simple online and realtime tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 3464–3468). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533003
3. Zhang, Y., Sun, P., Jiang, Y., Yu, D., Weng, F., Yuan, Z., Luo, P., Liu, W., & Wang, X. (2022). ByteTrack: Multi-object tracking by associating every detection box. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 1–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20047-2_1
4. Cao, J., Pang, J., Weng, X., Khirodkar, R., & Kitani, K. (2023). Observation-centric SORT: Rethinking SORT for robust multi-object tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 9686–9696). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00934
5. Du, Y., Zhao, Z., Song, Y., Zhao, Y., Su, F., Gong, T., & Meng, H. (2023). StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT great again. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25, 8725–8737. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2023.3240881
6. Wojke, N., Bewley, A., & Paulus, D. (2017). Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. –3649). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296962
7. Bergmann, P., Meinhardt, T., & Leal-Taixé, L. (2019). Tracking without bells and whistles. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 941–951). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00103
8. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1/A:1010933404324
9. Geifman, Y., & El-Yaniv, R. (2017). Selective classification for deep neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 4878–4887). Curran Associates.
10. Zhu, P., Wen, L., Du, D., et al. (2019). VisDrone-VDT2018: The vision meets drone video detection and tracking challenge results. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops (pp.–518). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11021-5_29
11. Feng, T., Wang, X., Han, F., Zhang, L., & Zhu, W. (2024). U2UData: A large-scale cooperative perception dataset for swarm UAVs autonomous flight. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 7600–7608). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/363681151
12. Li, W., Xiang, H., Wang, T., Wu, S., Xia, Q., Wang, C., & Wen, C. (2026). V2U4Real: A real-world large-scale dataset for vehicle-to-UAV cooperative perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4728–4737). IEEE.
Review
For citations:
Trofimov Yu.V., Averkin A.N., Shevchenko A.V., Kuznetsov E.M., Lebedev A.D. Interpretable Control of Track Initiation with Predefined Intervention Bounds in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Perception Systems. Intelligent transport. 2026;10(3(39)):69-84. https://doi.org/10.24412/3033-6007-2026-339-69-84
JATS XML




